make a long story short, in America’s case, the people are sovereigns,
served - not ruled- by government unless they consent otherwise. If
they consent to be subject citizens, they descend in status to servants
of the servant government, and become persons liable. This can be
readily seen in the USCON, where “people” have rights and powers, while
“citizens” have privileges and immunities."
To participate in the democratic form, especially the socialist
democratic form, while harboring such goals as smaller government, lower
taxes, and more liberty is a total waste. You cannot reform the system
in that fashion. It’s like sending a missionary to a pirate ship to get
it to change its evil ways. At best, the pleas will fall on deaf ears.
At worst, the missionary will walk the plank.
There IS a
remedy, but you may not realize it. It goes back to 1776 and the
Declaration of Independence. Remember, job #1 is secure rights and job
#2 is to govern those who consent. And securing rights simply meant
prosecution of deliberate injuries and adjudication of accidental
injuries (after the fact). As to being “governed,” those who did not or
could not consent, were never subject to the terms of the compacts. But
those who did consent, surrendered or waived rights, and could be
compelled to perform mandatory civic duties in exchange for the exercise
of privileges such as civil and political liberty.
To make a
long story short, in America’s case, the people are sovereigns, served -
not ruled- by government unless they consent otherwise. If they
consent to be subject citizens, they descend in status to servants of
the servant government, and become persons liable. This can be readily
seen in the USCON, where “people” have rights and powers, while
“citizens” have privileges and immunities.
In the 1820s, the
people were lured into “joining up” with the democratic form of
government and shifted the balance of power, so that the partisan
political parties could rise to dominance, power and wealth. Prior to
that decade, the only people who could vote and hold office had to own
property and have paid taxes - a small subset of the nation. And
coincidentally, the only people compelled to perform mandatory civic
duties like jury duty and militia duty (the obligation to train, fight,
and die, on command) were those same Americans. Everyone else was not so
liable nor obligated.
A restoration of the original republican
form of government cannot be achieved by the ballot. Waiving rights to
participate in the democratic form cannot restore rights. The only
remedy is to withdraw consent from the system : from FICA (socialism)
and from submission to the democratic form. Examine your local state
laws and constitution for proof that American nationals / inhabitants
with domiciles who absolutely own private property retain their natural
and personal liberty. Verify that private property is not subject to ad
valorem taxes as is qualified ownership of estate (real and personal
property). Verify that non-residents (inhabitants) are not obligated to
register themselves, their property nor get permissions (licenses)
before they can exercise their rights and liberties.
Do not be
daunted by a lack of explicit mention of those who are not subject to
the government. “They” have been carefully running a scam for many many
generations. Just tally up the differences between the inhabitants and
residents, domiciles and residences, the nationals and the citizens, the
sovereigns and the subjects. Once you accumulate enough facts and data,
you will be convinced.