Monday, February 25, 2013

When Did Ignorance Become A Point Of View?

Just how ignorant do people have to be before we experience another dark age? Are we there yet? 
~ Chris Duke

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

I Would Approve Of This Diagram If...

I would approve of this diagram if it included all the parties involved in the machine. Not just the main two, but ALL of them. The machine will not ever cut it's nose off to spite it's face. Any change thought possible from within the machine is completely delusional. 

For change to happen, we must first stand above the machine as it's rightful masters and quit standing in or under it as a part of it or it's subjects. The machine is supposed to be a creature under OUR authority and not the other way around as people now believe. 

Corporation Government

The corporations (USA inc, Canada inc, etc) presume themselves to be above us because everyone consents to it. As citizens we give them their power. As the people it is we who hold all the power. We need to stop consenting to being citizens with only civil liberties (privileges) and reoccupy our "We the People" status to regain the rights we have given away. The ONLY sovereignty a state can possess is borrowed from it's people. Once removed, the state ceases to exist.

Birth Certificate

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

The Philosophy of Liberty


Sometimes the best way to prove something, it to try to disprove it.
Chris Duke

The Notice I Sent The Court In Regards To A Traffic Ticket

Your name: spell it out in proper English with no abbreviations
Mailing address: spell it out in proper English with no abbreviations and enclose your zip in parentheses [90501]
 Your phone # and email



Dear Superior Court Southwest District, Clerk, Judge, any and all parties, and persons expressing interest in their official bonded capacities as agents of the court in regards to Citation # TXXXXXX.

The main purpose for this notice is to inform you of my acceptance of your claim, and to provide you with a request for information I need to lawfully bring this case to a close threw honorable pretrial discussion. I have traveled to the court on two separate occasions, and no record of citation # TXXXXXX can be found by the court clerk. Am I to assume that you no longer wish to contract with me on this matter?

You must respond within 10 days of receipt of this notice or you will forever create permanent estoppel by acquiescence to all points not refuted forever barring this matter from being raised again. I am attempting to fulfill the requirements of your notice in honor.

I accept your notice conditionally. I accept that you are trying to communicate with me something apparently of great importance. But I hereby discharge your notice by seeking clarification as to exactly what you are trying to tell me. It appears as though you are claiming I owe you money for some reason, however the amount is not specified anywhere on this notice I have received from you, nor is there an itemized statement of the charges and amounts of them. I assume you are claiming I owe you money. I understand that transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties, as do adjudication services thereto, and I do hereby deny said consent to engage in any transactions of security interests. The conditions by which I accept this notice of an alleged debt are simple. I request a signed original bill which was not duly presented, and a copy of the lawful 2 party contract that makes me liable to pay it. It is clear to me this is not a criminal matter as there is no allegations of a breech of the peace. I will assume that if the information requested, an original signed bill to be duly presented, and a copy of the lawful 2 party contract making me liable to pay, is not provided that it does not exist and that I am not liable for the charges. Let it also be known that I intend to ask questions should this matter go to a trial or a hearing. I intend to discover the validity or lack there of, of the cause of action against me. I do not see any evidence of testimony in this ticket that indicates there is a complaining party, there also does not appear to be any valid cause of action at all. I am aware of what a valid cause of action is and how many elements compose one, and I do not even see one of those elements alleged against me. At the arraignment hearing I intend to move to dismiss all charges for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, as there is no actual injured party. I not only intend to question the officer about the validity of the cause of action, but also regarding the elements that compose it. I suggest it is in the best interests of all parties involved that these charges be withdrawn. As I stated I do not see any evidence or even allegation of a breech of the peace, standing, corpus delicti, actual or justifiable controversy, or a valid cause of action. I await your response which will either inform me the charges have been withdrawn, or the date of the hearing at which I will appear to secure discussion and discovery in this matter. I thank you very much for your time and cooperation. I hereby declare attest and swear that all information in this document is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I have personal knowledge of the facts contained herein and do accept personal responsibility for all statements made and facts presented.

Most Sincerely,
Your Name: spell it out in proper English with no abbreviations

SIGNED______________________ Notary__________________________________________
You can get creative with these notices. This one is 90% copied from a friend who has successfully used notice to have traffic tickets dropped by the court. I changed about 10% of the letter (indicated in red background) to suit my situation.

This notice cancels your notice (ticket) to appear. Without a reply from the court to this notice (and they almost never reply) you no longer have an appearance date. 

This notice is best followed up by a second notice, and then a third notice of default judgement. You get the default judgement from your notary public when the court fails to answer your first and second notices. Your second notice gets changed only enough to let them know about the pending default judgement if they do not reply to your second attempt at honorable discussion. All these notices need to be stamped by a notary public for the court to see them. While you can go to the court and drop them off yourself and get a court stamp on them as well as proof that they have been entered into the file, it is best to have your notary send them registered mail. Have your notary open a file for these notices so you have record of delivery. It is also needed for the default judgement. The default is not sent to the court. It is kept by your notary for their pickup. If they do not pick it up, it is yours. 

While it is not necessary for you to appear after giving these notices, I would recommend that you do to hand them the notices and proof of claim of default. I would start out by saying after your name has been brought up "I am here for that matter. For Public record, I am making a special appearance in regards to ticket # XXXXXXX, and have waived all privileges." Then call the bailiff over and hand him your notices and proof of service with the default judgement for the judge to see. 

Also worth noting, your first notice should be sent within the first three days of receiving the ticket. I'll explain more about that in a future post.

I will post up the other notices as I send them in to the court and bookmark them for you on the side bar for EZ reference.

I am not an attorney at law. Everything in these notices and any other text in this post is to the best of my knowledge true and correct. The effectiveness of using any process is in your ability to understand what it is that YOU are doing. If you do not understand the processes here, I suggest you just pay your ticket and go back to being a good little sheeple. I have spent months and months learning about this stuff. I suggest you stop by and get the quick course from my friend Rob Johnson. His E book is under $50 and explains in very good detail the how and why these notices work. It would of saved me the months of research and confusion had I picked it up a long time ago. You can order it on this link.

It is also worth noting that I have no association with, and receive no benefit for mentioning or recommending the purchase of the materials contained there in. This blogs sole reason is to help others take back their power and to show them how to hold these festering leaches that call themselves government accountable for their actions.

Monday, February 18, 2013

My Understanding On The Meaning Of Words

"How's the dictionary getting on?" Winston asked his comrade Syme, who worked with him in the Research Department. "We're getting the language into its final shape," Syme answered. "By the year 2050 at the very latest not a single human being will be alive who could understand the conversation we are having now." 1984, George Orwell.

From time to time you hear the term legalese. Usually it pertains to the meaning of words used in court. And then the statement goes on about how "they" changed the meaning of the word so that the general public can not understand what's going on, in order to get them to cop to something unknowingly.

The question is, have they changed the words meanings or has everyone else? It's my opinion that the definitions in law dictionary's have remained pretty consistent through time, while people have gotten lazy in their use and interpretation. I'm guilty of it myself. I'm learning though. I think that if any meanings have been purposefully changed, it had been in the non legal dictionary's to reflect their contemporary usage and not the other way around.

 Learning the proper definitions of the written words is [IMOP] a part of our responsibility, and a prerequisite to our coming of age. Our age of consent, so as to not be treated as children by the nanny state. How can we consider ourselves as anything other than incompetent or children that are wards of the state if we can't even understand the meaning of the written word? Context is everything in law.

 The powers that be get their power threw ignorance and consent. Nothing more.

 Chris otf Duke

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Freedom. Get it? If so, than you probably got it.

With all due respect to Mr. King, you do not demand it either. That is the same thing as asking for it. You simply take it. 

Season of Treason III

Tips on exiting the State commercial license and "vehicle" registration.

Last October 2012, the USDOT notified everyone that they were discontinuing the "Vehicle Registrant Only" category, the only non-commercial alternative among five, the rest of which are for commercial applications. So the information in the video is now invalidated by the USDOT's elimination of the one non-commercial option.

Forest Says

Haha! Good one. 
But does he know that it only applies to the people and not the citizens?

Not About Now.

Well, this happened a long long time ago. 
The patriots were not there or were ignored in favor of privileges. And by patriot, I'm not referring to a guy with a gun. I'm referring to the guy with the pen and the knowledge in how to use it to keep us from being corporatized, monetized with fiat currency, where law is made illegal, and legality privatized fraud, theft, extortion, rape, kidnapping, and endless war.

Samuel Adams was correct. But to use this image to quantify what is happening today in 2013, you would be well over a hundred years off your mark.

Bill Thornton Quote

"The law is not meant for the man with good intent. The law is meant for the man who is the law breaker."
~Bill Thornton

Saturday, February 16, 2013

So you're a sovereign citizen?

Sovereign: adj. Self Governing, independent. Has natural rights.

Citizen: noun. A person owing loyalty to and entitled by birth or naturalization to the protection of a state or nation. Has only civil liberties. Not rights!

 Self Governing or Loyalty to. PICK ONE! You cannot be a sovereign and a citizen at the same time. They are mutually exclusive.

William "Bill" Dale Foust Man on the Land and The Secretary of State and the Powers of Notary Public


William Dale Foust De Jure Arizona Chief Justice Murdered by De Facto Police of Page

Written by 
Morpheus Titania
Date: 06-20-2011
Subject: Death

The Republic for the united States of America
From the Desk of the Chief Ambassador
RuSA Verification #: RP208703120RuSA
Monday, June 20, 2011
Regarding: William Dale Foust
To My Fellow Americans,

It is with a heavy, heavy, broken heart that I write this press release this morning.  My friend, Billy Foust, left this world yesterday evening for another. In a most tragic manner Bill was shot and killed by a Page, Arizona police officer in the driveway of his home. The specifics of the incident are not known at this time. As details become available the Republic will be notified. So that we all may honor Bill, his loved ones, and the Republic for which he stood and that he loved beyond measure, please take pause in your day for a moment to remember our brother and pray for Bill, his wife, his family, and all those that require our Father’s blessing at this time.

To read the rest of the story go here:

So you want to be represented by a Lawyer?

Better think again!

Fleeting Remedy?

I don't know about the word never, but I would bet that unless people start paying attention and seeking the lawful remedy, it could be a very long time before we will have a chance to use that remedy without violence again.

Kenneth Allen Hopf Quote

"As long as your theory isn't logically or apodictically false, some evidence somewhere will be consistent with it. Of course, that same evidence will be consistent with many other theories, perhaps infinitely many others, as well. Furthermore, there is typically nothing we can actually use in probability theory that resolves the question of which theory is most likely true. This simple logical circumstance, I believe, is responsible for most of the deliberate mistakes that people make, not only in the way they think about theories and evidence but also in their personal life. The idea that evidence supports our theory is so seductive partly because we are fooled by the seeming simplicity with which we perceive our environment. We are unaware of the long and bloody road by which evolution brought us to the present. Beyond that, however, the idea of evidential support effectively frees us, within very broad limits, to believe whatever we want to believe while at the same time giving us the excuse that our opinions are entirely evidence based and therefore in some sense scientific. Generally speaking, people cannot resist the temptation to believe that reality is pretty much what they think it is. Therein lies the source of most of the resistance to the philosophy of Popper, for he defended the idea that we ought to adopt an ethic of systemic resistance to our own gullibility." -- Kenneth Allen Hopf

Free Dean Clifford

Minister's Office
Phone: 204-945-3728

Fax: 204-945-2517
Minister of Justice

Bill Thornton

Come To Bed Honey.

Yeah, citizens should be worried. Your civil liberties do not provide for your owning a gun. By your own consent you have traded that right away for privileges. Only We The People have the right to bear arms. 

Free Dean Clifford / Blog Talk Radio

Listen to internet radio with GLOBAL FACT RADIO on Blog Talk Radio

Action, Reaction

Everything Is A Remix

This is pretty cool.


I have just started this blog today to keep record of my research. I plan on adding a link list soon so everyone can access for FREE the sites I'm using to educate myself in the peaceful application of lawful remedy.

If your sick of what's going on, I hope to help you to understand the why and how of it. I don't claim to know everything. In fact, I'm just starting out relative to some people who have been doing this for decades. I hope to get a few of them on here to help out with the posting, and to provide their perspective from their own lips.

The site will be getting better as I start to really get into it. For the moment, I will just be transferring data from another account. As you noticed in the posts below, some of it does not transfer well. That will be corrected for in the future. I think I need to post as html? I'll see the next few posts how they turn out.

I found some interesting links last night. This one was recommended by Bill Thornton on one of his video's. This course sounds to be an advanced study on court procedures. Not for everybody.

Here's a link to Bill's video's.

I highly recommend picking up Rob Johnson's book first. His is much simpler and covers everything you need to know that is in the more expensive course. I have Rob's book and it's all I need to win every time against the revenue collectors. You can pick it up at threw paypal. <- I really recommend Rob's book! I would like to also get the courtroom procedures book one day, but at over $200, I'm not going to have the funds for such a thing in the near future. Rob's book is under $50. EZ!
Considering the truth that the more you learn, the more you realize how much more there is to learn, do we ever really get past the starting point before we die, or is it all an illusion?

Chris Duke
You can get a book of knowledge, but it's up to you to read it.

Chris Duke