Showing posts with label consent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label consent. Show all posts
Monday, November 4, 2013
Only slaves ask for permission to exercise rights.
Actually, the title to this post is wrongheaded. Slaves don't have rights. They only are granted privileges by their masters. They MUST beg for permission to exercise those privileges.
Think about that the next time your about to beg them for permission to do something.
Ask yourself:
1. Is what I want to do lawful to do?
a) If yes, then why do you need to be licensed to do it?
b) If No, then how would asking government somehow make it a lawful activity?
2. Is it my right to do this?
3. Do I have the right to do this?
4. Does it harm another or their rights if I do this?
5. Is there ANY fraud involved? (Gov can not license fraudulent activities, even though they do it all the time)
6. Does my asking for permission to do lawful acts grant them my consent to step in and tell me what to do?
7. Do they then have MY permission to tell me just how I can exercise a right because I consented by asking for their permission?
8. Who died and made them god?
9. Are they MY public servants or MY masters?
a) If public servants, then why are you asking them for permission to exercise your rights?
b) If "masters" then learn why granting them your consent makes that so! And learn what granting them your consent even means!
c) Do I even have rights after I granted them to someone else?
Some stuff to think about before you go begging some pointy headed bureaucrat public servant for permission to exercise your rights such as a constitutionally protected right to bear arms.
I disagree with some of the information presented in this video, but for the most part, I do agree with the content.
Labels:
consensual servitude,
consent,
fraud,
lawful,
lawful activity,
license,
master,
masters,
permission,
pointy headed bureaucrat public servant,
public servants,
Rights,
servitude,
slave,
slavery,
slaves,
unlawful
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Protesting By Consenting Subjects
Here's a great example of citizens asking to get a spanking. Actually, for a citizen to say this could be construed as treason.
The bill of rights only tells gov to leave the rights of the People alone. Citizens gave up those rights when they consented to be governed. So when you see a protester arrested, and they are complaining that their rights have been violated, what has really happened is their 'civil liberties' (privileges) have not been respected. They can try to sue over it so long as the illusion that civil liberties / civil rights are the same thing as natural rights, protected by the bill of rights, is still being maintained. To 'PROTEST' 'YOUR GOVERNMENT,' think about the words your using. By taking part in 'protesting' what your doing is saying "I'm a bad little subject and want to be punished." "I am standing UNDER your authority by my own consent." If you want to beg your masters to change their ways, your gonna get spanked. They are not YOUR public servants when you consent to stand UNDER them! At that point they become your masters and ya better do as they tell you.
Labels:
bill of rights,
civil liberties,
civil rights,
consent,
free speech,
Gov,
government,
masters,
natural rights,
privileges,
protesting,
public servants,
Rights,
spanking,
stand under
Thursday, October 10, 2013
Consentual Violation
If you would grant your consent to those who regularly violate you and your rights, then you have no rights.
~ Chris otf: Duke
Labels:
consent,
pigs,
politicians,
Rights
You And I Are The Power
We are the power that fuels the political machines.
I didn't have a real clue what the movie was actually representing when I happened to catch it on regular TV (back when there still was such a thing) late at night trying to fall asleep so I could go to work the next day. I didn't see it until years after it was out of the theaters. I didn't think I would like it from the commercials. Man was I wrong! I was just about asleep when Neo stepped threw the looking glass, and then I was wide awake the whole night! The movie hit a nerve, but it wasn't till years later I discovered just why that was. The symbolism is indeed brilliant.
The people themselves hold all the power. If they only realized that fact. The only real power these charlatans thrive off of is consent. If you give them your consent to rule over you, then you have no right to complain. The whole left v right paradigm is set up to keep you as human cattle, consenting slaves to the wishes of the few.
Remove your consent and show them a real shutdown. In order to do that, you will have to learn a few things. There is no magic red or blue pill for you to swallow. Your trip threw the looking glass is a long one. It is your human right to freedom of choice that will allow you to make the journey. If you decide not to make the journey, you are no more than a zombie battery. Be free, or be a zombie, it's your choice. The information is out there. A lot of it is here on this blog with more being added every day.
Check out the links on the sidebar and at the bottom of the page and start studying. Stop being consenting slaves!
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
Consent
I find that in the loss of freedoms we are our own worse enemies. Consent gives them away. We need to learn how to stop giving it on all levels.
~ Chris otf: Duke
People need to learn just what consent is before they can stop giving it. To one who does not understand what constitutes consent, it all appears to be trickery. When you understand, then you become the one who is large and in charge.
Thursday, September 26, 2013
How much sour milk does one need to drink before they discover that the nanny States tit is bad?
I was just going over some old posts here when I realized this meme deserved some commentary and I had given it none. I shared it on fellow freedom advocate Robert Menard's Facebook page. Thought I would just copy and paste the post here.
Why Sovereignty may be a doomed concept for the masses.
Like you've said Robert,
people need to grow up and get out from under their (governments) roof
and on their own. Most people buying the big lie, when they turn 18,
just trade in their natural parents for government. They go from being a
dependent of their parents to being a dependent of the machine /
fiction / State. Government becomes both mother and father threw that
dependency. So long as they continue providing the State with their
consent to be dependent on the State, they trade in their sovereign
rights for privileges and are treated as children. When they complain,
they are then punished like children. Running with scissors is not a
crime, but it may get you a spanking if you get caught doing it if you
remain a dependent child / STATE citizen.
Instead of using the term 'wake up' I prefer using the term 'grow up' for that reason. A child can be awake, but still is a child dependent on mother and father.
Labels:
children of state,
consent,
Freedom,
government tit,
grow up,
nanny state,
privileges,
Rights,
Robert Manard,
Sovereignty,
tit
Friday, September 20, 2013
Example of a cop not knowing what the hell he's talking about!
By: Robert Menard
Maxim = No man may govern another without his consent.
Lets see it in action
Menard "I deny my consent to the terms of your contract and by the rule of contract law your contract is invalid."
Cop "I don't agree to your withdrawal of consent and by the rule of contract law you must agree to it because your very argument rests that "no man may govern another without his consent" and by withdrawing your consent to my rules you are attempting to force your rules on me without my consent"
THIS IS THE IDIOCY OF THE RANDI FORUM. According to them, if you refuse to enter into a contract with them (as contract law allows), they can refuse to be bound by contract law, and then claim their contract is lawfully binding upon you.
DAFUQ?
Lets see it in action
Menard "I deny my consent to the terms of your contract and by the rule of contract law your contract is invalid."
Cop "I don't agree to your withdrawal of consent and by the rule of contract law you must agree to it because your very argument rests that "no man may govern another without his consent" and by withdrawing your consent to my rules you are attempting to force your rules on me without my consent"
THIS IS THE IDIOCY OF THE RANDI FORUM. According to them, if you refuse to enter into a contract with them (as contract law allows), they can refuse to be bound by contract law, and then claim their contract is lawfully binding upon you.
DAFUQ?
Labels:
consent,
contract law,
dumb cop,
grossly incompetent cop,
idiot cop,
ignorant cop,
negligently incompetent cop,
Robert Menard,
stupid cop
Monday, September 16, 2013
To Withdraw Consent
"To withdraw consent is far-reaching. It means a divorce from the state insofar as this is possible. It means having no loyalty to the state, seeing the state as fundamentally unfair and a source of continual injustices, being unwilling to help the state in any way, assuming and feeling no responsibility for the state’s actions, and seeing the state as hostile to peace and society. It means not participating in its rituals and having no appreciation of its symbols or myths. It means a psychological divorce from feeling positive about or approving of its victories. It means working toward the state’s opposite, that is, living together in freedom, friendship, comity and peace, i.e., in society."
- Michael S. Rozeff
Really,
the biggest part of Ron Paul's message was to opt out. Too bad that
most of his followers didn't pick up on that note. I'm sure he was not
allowed to talk about it in great detail. HE GAVE HIS FOLLOWERS THE
ANSWER, and they chose not to listen. Well,,, most of them... http://accountabilityforpeople.blogspot.com/...
Labels:
consent,
Opt out,
withdraw consent
Sunday, September 15, 2013
Man up or shut up!
Haha, no kidding. It does make a difference as to what status your in though. If you have consented to them, then ya don't deserve to have them if they come for for your guns. Children have to do what their parents tell them to do. If your a government dependent, then your screwed. Do what they tell you and shut up. Or learn what your rights are and begin standing on them.
Labels:
coming for my guns,
consent,
dependent,
federal government,
Government dependent,
gun control,
guns,
status
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Legalization
I've been making the very same point Dean is in this video. Legalization of anything is bad. If it's not unlawful to do, then why legalize it? Why would you want to beg someone for permission to do something that is not unlawful to do in the first place? As soon as something is made 'legal' then it is subject to regulation, fines, taxes, and penalties. Legalization is a scam to steal money from people who have committed no crime, breach of the peace, fraud, or harmed, or stolen from anyone, and that is all it ever will be.
Labels:
consent,
dependents,
governed,
government,
illegal,
independence,
law,
lawful,
laws,
legal,
legalization,
pot,
regulations,
Rights,
sovereign,
sovereign rights,
unlawful,
weed
Thursday, June 20, 2013
The Jones Plantation
Labels:
consent,
Joans Plantation,
Larken Rose,
slavery
Monday, June 17, 2013
Illegal Alien Consent Trickery
This is funny. Getting tricked into giving
consent, and all the other consenting citizens all pissed off about it.
Hahaha! What's next? Begging for permission to exercise human rights
like good little citizens? The very moment anyone signs that voter registration form, they are giving consent to be subjects of government and loose what rights they had as human beings in exchange for privileges. But here in MERICA, serfdom is it's own club, and nobody wants to share the government handouts.
"Supreme Court: Voters Need Not Be Citizens
Posted on June 17, 2013
supreme_court_building
The Supreme Court is paving the way for illegals to vote as they make it easier for them to register to vote in our country. All they need to do is sign a registration form saying they are citizens and they will be allowed to vote. Checking this out is no longer allowed. We already have amnesty in this country. Immigration reform will be a joke since there will be no reason for them to even want to become a citizen!
Check it out:
The Supreme Court says states cannot require would-be voters to prove they are U.S. citizens before using a federal registration system designed to make signing up easier.
The justices voted 7-2 to throw out Arizona’s voter-approved requirement that prospective voters document their U.S. citizenship in order to use a registration form produced under the federal “Motor Voter” voter registration law.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, which doesn’t require such documentation, trumps Arizona’s Proposition 200 passed in 2004. Arizona officials say their law is needed to stop non-Americans from voting in elections, while opponents see it as an attack on minorities, immigrants and the elderly."
Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/06/supreme-court-voters-need-not-be-citizens/#ixzz2WUkmgioj
"Supreme Court: Voters Need Not Be Citizens
Posted on June 17, 2013
supreme_court_building
The Supreme Court is paving the way for illegals to vote as they make it easier for them to register to vote in our country. All they need to do is sign a registration form saying they are citizens and they will be allowed to vote. Checking this out is no longer allowed. We already have amnesty in this country. Immigration reform will be a joke since there will be no reason for them to even want to become a citizen!
Check it out:
The Supreme Court says states cannot require would-be voters to prove they are U.S. citizens before using a federal registration system designed to make signing up easier.
The justices voted 7-2 to throw out Arizona’s voter-approved requirement that prospective voters document their U.S. citizenship in order to use a registration form produced under the federal “Motor Voter” voter registration law.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, which doesn’t require such documentation, trumps Arizona’s Proposition 200 passed in 2004. Arizona officials say their law is needed to stop non-Americans from voting in elections, while opponents see it as an attack on minorities, immigrants and the elderly."
Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/06/supreme-court-voters-need-not-be-citizens/#ixzz2WUkmgioj
Labels:
consent,
Illegal Aliens,
Rights,
tricks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













