Word Masturbation Of The Criminally Insane

By: Stefen Randall  
"Claiming that man created rules, code, and regulation is law, is word masturbation of the criminally insane.

Law is that which is objectively binding upon human action that can not be avoided, example: every cause has and effect.

The idea that man can create law is constructive fraud created by the mind of the criminally insane with delusions of grandeur."

Just whom may take advantage of constitutionally protected rights in their own defense?

 

 Notice how it reads 'We the People' and NOT We the US citizens.

There are laws, and then there are rules. I see people complaining about statutory rules all the time that are not laws, and need not comply with the constitutional restrictions on government. The constitution ONLY limits the government from enacting unconstitutional laws against the People. It does NOT limit governments ability to enact rules for their subjects that they themselves MUST obey.  Until you realize this, you can read all the law books, statutes, acts, etc until your eyes bleed, but it won't do you much good.

If your just now waking up to what allows government to get away with doing what they have been doing, then let me point out one simple truth to you. If you are a US citizen, then you ARE considered an employee of government. A trustee. A dependent. As such, you are not governed by law, but rather by rules. Once you realize the different statuses between the People, and UNITED STATES citizens, everything suddenly becomes a lot clearer. 

The US government is a corporation, and as such has rules their employees must follow. Just like at Walmart. If your an employee, you most follow their rules when at work. These rules are NOT laws, as customers to the store are not required to follow them. Think of it this way, US citizens = Walmart employees, and the People = the customers. US citizens have acts and statutes to govern them as children of mother and father big brother gov. As US citizens, you do not have rights. You ONLY have privileges handed down to you by your mother and father gov. You are considered to be a child dependent on gov. Incapable of handling your own affairs, or providing for yourself. The People on the other hand, are considered adults, capable of handling their own affairs and providing for themselves.  The People take no benefits from their creation, gov. They are the ones who lay out the rules for government. 

There are also international laws which regulate government. These laws deal in commerce. Remember, gov is a corporation and must obey the rules of commerce. The Law Of Nations comprises most of these international laws, and it is written into the Declaration Of Independence. It is no more than a footnote, but having been written into the compact, becomes a whole part to that compact. 

Below, lists the law set up to regulate government by the People to protect themselves from a potentially overreaching government. It does NOT apply to US citizens. US citizens are NOT a party to it! 
Padelford, Fay & Co. v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah
14 Ga. 438, 1854 WL 1492 (Ga., Jan Term 1854) (NO. 64)

"No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a compact, he is not a party to it."

[5.] The Constitution is to be construed in the sense in which it was understood by the makers of it at the time when they made it.
[6.] This sense is expressed by the four following propositions:

2. That the Constitution delegated to the General Government, or any department thereof, no power by implication, but only delegated such powers as it expressly enumerated.
3. That it delegated no exclusive power, unless the delegation was said to be exclusive.
4. That it laid no prohibition upon the States, except such as it specified.
5. That the words used in it, if susceptible of more meanings than one, were used in the meaning which was least favorable to the delegation of power, and most favorable to its retention.

Get this fact threw your head, and the entire mess begins to unravel before your very eyes.

 

The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.

16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:

 

Motion in the COURT

This is a point I've heard my friend Ray make on several occasions. When I hear someone talking about making a motion in court, I always shake my head. After reading this, you will too. Article taken from Facebook. I'll be bookmarking this post at the bottom of the page for easy reference.

By: Ray Cox

Options for this story

I figured maybe, I should post this on my wall too!

I had posted this before, but didn't put my 2 cents within the text so you could get what I was saying while you read it! Everything within ((and)) is my example.

Take an Object of any kind, and set it in front of you. Now, that area in front of you is evidence. If you were to take a picture, that would be evidence too. But, if you move the Object before you take the Picture, or have the Evidence accepted, you have destroyed the evidence. Same thing goes in the COURT. All Motions are the movement or motion of the evidence, and their design is to modify that evidence to deny truth, evidence, fact, or law into the COURT. Motion in the COURT is only allowed in ADJECTIVE LAW, or (Law without Noun) (Which means Law without People, Place, or Thing). ADJECTIVE LAW is known in the COURT as PROCEDURE. If you look up Procedure in Blacks Law, 4th Edition, you will see what I mean. ((Added by me below will be in brackets))

PROCEDURAL LAW. That which prescribes method of enforcing rights or obtaining redress for their invasion; ((Only the FICTION has to have Rights Enforced, our Rights are Natural)) machinery for carrying on a suit. Barker v. St. Louis County, 340 Mo. 986, 104 S.W.2d 371, 377, 378, 379. As relating to crimes, that which provides or regulates the steps by which one who violates a criminal statute is punished. ((Is it Possible for the Living to violate a CRIMINAL STATUTE?)) State v. Elmore, 179 La. 1057, 155 So. 896. PROCEDURE. .The mode of proceeding by which a legal right is enforced, as distinguished from 1367

PROCEDURE
the law which gives or defines the right ((didn't the Constitution do that)), and which, by means of the proceeding, the court Is to administer ((oh, ADMINISTERIAL COURT)); the machinery ((Machinery not the Living!)), as distinguished from its product. Per Lush, L. J., in 7 Q. B. Div, 333. That which regulates the formal steps in an, action ((Action is the command for the beginning of a Play! Take 2, and ACTION!!!)) ((It is not the Judgement of Law)) or other judicial proceeding; a form, man- ner, and order of conducting suits or prosecutions. ((Conducting SUITS and Pro Se Cutions, not Common Law))Mahoning Valley Ry. Co. v. Santoro, 93 Ohio St. 53, 112 N.E. 190, 191. The judicial process for enforcing rights and duties recognized by substantive ((What the hell is Substantive Law to the living?)) law and for justly administering redress for infraction of them. ((This is all Law for those in the FICTION, it is Administrative in nature, and is in direct violation of the Constitution)) Sims v. United Pacific Ins. Co., D.C.Idaho, 51 F.Supp. 433, 435. This term is commonly opposed to the sum of legal principles constituting the substance of the law ((Re-read that last sentence several times. "is commonly opposed to the sum of legal principles constituting the substance of the law" so, PROCEDURE is Opposed to Substance of Law!!)) , and denotes the body of rules, whether of practice or of pleading ((Practice and Pleading are for ATTORNEYS and SLAVES respectively)) , whereby rights are effectuated ((Why and how are Rights Effectuated)) through the successful application of the proper remedies. It is also generally distinguished from the law of evidence. ((Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding, we have a winner folks! Read that last sentence a dozen or so times! Why would you distinguish something from the law of evidence, unless you were purposely committing a fraud????)) Brown; Sackheim v. Pigueron, 215 N.Y. 62, 109 N.E. 109, 111. Cochran v. Ward, 3 Ind.App. 89, 29 N.E. 795, 31 N.E. 581, 51 Am.St.Rep. 229. Procedure is the machinery for carrying on the suit, including pleading, process, evidence, and practice, whether in the trial court or the appellate court, or in the processes by which causes are carried to appellate courts for review, or in laying the foundation for such review. ((Procedure is not for the Living)) Jones v. Erie R. Co., 106 Ohio St. 408, 140 N.E. 366, 367. It not only embraces practice ((Not Law, but Practice)) in courts, but regulation of the conduct of the court itself wherein such practice takes place. State v. Greenwald, 186 Ind. 321, 116 N.E. 296, 297. The law of procedure is what is now commonly termed by jurists "adjective law," (q. v.). ((Adjective Law has no Noun, no Truth, no Evidence, no Fact, so in Adjective Law, nothing is real, it is all a FICTION, a CARTOON, it is all in MOTION!!))

Legalization

I've been making the very same point Dean is in this video. Legalization of anything is bad. If it's not unlawful to do, then why legalize it? Why would you want to beg someone for permission to do something that is not unlawful to do in the first place? As soon as something is made 'legal' then it is subject to regulation, fines, taxes, and penalties. Legalization is a scam to steal money from people who have committed no crime, breach of the peace, fraud, or harmed, or stolen from anyone, and that is all it ever will be.

Standing Up To The Pirates

I meant to post this last week when it was going down, but I have been having some computer problems that have been keeping me from posting much here the past week. This is my friend Trent Goodbaudy riding up to the police who were harassing his sister on his bike. Good job Trent! Standing up to these pirates is what we all need to do for a better future.  



Trent has a website you should check out. Here's the link: http://freedomfromgovernment.us/ Trent's link is also on the link list on the blogs sidebar so you can find it without having to hunt down this post again.
He has some stuff that is really neat in regards to the travel vs driving discussion.

Statutes v Law

"Statutes = The terms and conditions of various registration contracts that acquire the force of law by your signed CONSENT in registration.

LAW = The lawful defense of individual life, freedom, or property."

-- Rob Johnson

This calls them laws, but they are not, they are code.

by Ray Cox (Notes) on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 7:53pm

HERE ARE LAWS IN AMERICA MOST DON'T KNOW, BUT SHOULD
The IRS is not a US government agency it is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund)(Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Sen...ate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391)

The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N.(Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. page 816)

The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921(41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654)
The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF (International Monetary Fund)(Presidential Documents Volume 24-No. 4 page 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-2887)
The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over.
(Executive Order 12803)
The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA, and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the U.S. government. Even though the "U.S. Government" held stock in the agencies.(U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239)
Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 forms not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are Department of the Treasury.(20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b))
There are NO Judicial courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes.(FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178)
There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administrators.(FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178)
According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a Social Security number.(House Report (103-826)
New York City is defined in Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that "New York City is the capital of the World." For once, he told the truth.(20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) )
Social Security is not insurance or a contract. Nor is there a Trust Fund.(Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619 Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548)
Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations.(It says U.S. Department of Treasury at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above)
You own NO property, Slaves can't own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours. you are listed as a TENANT.(Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
The Most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme court, but the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.(42 PA. C.S.A. 502)
The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War.(Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it.(Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
America is a British Colony. The 'United States' is a corporation, not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796(Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774)
Britain is owned by the Vatican.(Treaty of 1213)
The Pope can abolish any law in the United States(Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54)
A 1040 Form is for Tribute paid to Britain(IRS Publication 6209)
The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery.(Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493)
The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of Millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493)
The Pope's laws are obligatory on everyone.(Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44)
We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children.(Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)
Military Dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) into Districts(Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary of Estate)
"The People" does NOT include you and me.(Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243)
It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers.(SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348

Shout out for Rob Johnson and his book "Sui Juris Law - The Self Governing"

I was broke, but bought Robs book anyway. It's worth every penny and then some. He's not getting rich off of it. At $41.75 it's free. The money is more like handling charges. I may from time to time post some things here on the blog I'm not so sure about, but I will only ever endorse stuff that I do know works and to be true. I wholeheartedly endorse Rob's book Sui Juris Law - The Self Governing. People need to learn this stuff!

Robs site: http://www.suijurislaw.net/#media

From Robs site

Sui Juris: Lat."Of his own right; possessing full social and civil rights; not under any legal disability, or the power of another, or guardianship. Having capacity to manage one's own affairs; not under legal disability to act for one's self." Blacks Law 6th edition.

Sui Juris Law, The Self Governing, is a group for free Americans who wish to comprehend law, and what has happened to our once glorious country. This group will deal with the foundations of law in America, and explain a great many points of misunderstanding regarding law. Law is something that impacts every individual's life, and for some reason it is not a class taught in every grade of school. All Americans are expected to know and obey the law, while not all are required to speak a second language, yet we see which one has been given priority by those who claim to work for education.

The fundamental goal for this group is to teach individuals the difference between obligations of LAW, and obligations that one takes upon them self of their own voluntary signed consent in various civil adhesion contracts with government, SUBMITTED, via APPLICATION for REGISTRATION.

Everything in my book is up for free in my notes tab, but the book is much more detailed and comprehensive in it's format. I have written, published, and am selling MY book Sui Juris, of my own right and law, holding the copyright for the website and the book in absolute ownership. Individuals who read this book will learn about property, rights, law, The Constitution, The Declaration of Independence, common law, civil law, the difference between statutes and laws, the difference between legal and lawful, the difference between illegal and unlawful, the difference between RIGHTS and privileges.

If I have to do this one individual at a time, I will restore law to America, and the legacy of knowledge our forefathers left us, which has been corrupted by the BAR, the British Accreditation Registry.

These civil adhesion contracts by themselves are not a bad thing. They are excellent for limiting the liability of the irresponsible, it is only when these civil adhesion contracts are portrayed as obligations of law by other ignorant Americans, when they are not obligations of law. People no longer obey the law in this country, they obey what other people who have not investigated the law, tell them the law is. It is the difference between false assumptions with no basis in fact or law known as conventional wisdom, and true knowledge. I hope everyone enjoys this group, please contribute as much to the topic of law as possible.

PS. Also check out robs video and audio recordings on his site. I'm in the process of adding one of them to the side bar here today.