Only slaves ask for permission to exercise rights.

Actually, the title to this post is wrongheaded. Slaves don't have rights. They only are granted privileges by their masters. They MUST beg for permission to exercise those privileges.

Think about that the next time your about to beg them for permission to do something.
Ask yourself:

1. Is what I want to do lawful to do?
a) If yes, then why do you need to be licensed to do it?
b) If No, then how would asking government somehow make it a lawful activity?

2. Is it my right to do this?

3. Do I have the right to do this?

4. Does it harm another or their rights if I do this?

5. Is there ANY fraud involved? (Gov can not license fraudulent activities, even though they do it all the time)

6. Does my asking for permission to do lawful acts grant them my consent to step in and tell me what to do?

7. Do they then have MY permission to tell me just how I can exercise a right because I consented by asking for their permission?

8. Who died and made them god?

9. Are they MY public servants or MY masters?
a) If public servants, then why are you asking them for permission to exercise your rights?
b) If "masters" then learn why granting them your consent makes that so! And learn what granting them your consent even means!
c) Do I even have rights after I granted them to someone else?

Some stuff to think about before you go begging some pointy headed bureaucrat public servant for permission to exercise your rights such as a constitutionally protected right to bear arms. 

I disagree with some of the information presented in this video, but for the most part, I do agree with the content.
 

Begging For Marriage Permission

 By: Jamie Weare Notsheep Barker

August 20

 

"The Marriage License originated from the time when Free Men and Women would occasionally intermarry with slaves. You had to get permission from the slave's owner, thus a license. After the Civil War the slaves became Property of THE UNITED STATES called 14th Amendment U.S. citizens. A STATE marriage License today gives a slave (14 th amendment U.S. citizen) permission to marry A Free Man or Woman or to marry another slave. Because 14th Amendment citizens are property of the STATE (THE UNITED STATES), they have no lawful rights of any kind because in the eyes of the Law they don't exist, they are legally dead. They cannot marry without the STATE's permission. So if you beg ( apply) for a license to marry you are affirming their claim that you are STATE PROPERTY and that the products of your marriage are STATE PROPERTY. Are you STATE PROPERTY? Are your Sons and Daughters STATE PROPERTY (SLAVES)?"

Never ever apply (beg) for a license from the STATE to do something which you have a Natural Lawful Right to do.

Motion in the COURT

This is a point I've heard my friend Ray make on several occasions. When I hear someone talking about making a motion in court, I always shake my head. After reading this, you will too. Article taken from Facebook. I'll be bookmarking this post at the bottom of the page for easy reference.

By: Ray Cox

Options for this story

I figured maybe, I should post this on my wall too!

I had posted this before, but didn't put my 2 cents within the text so you could get what I was saying while you read it! Everything within ((and)) is my example.

Take an Object of any kind, and set it in front of you. Now, that area in front of you is evidence. If you were to take a picture, that would be evidence too. But, if you move the Object before you take the Picture, or have the Evidence accepted, you have destroyed the evidence. Same thing goes in the COURT. All Motions are the movement or motion of the evidence, and their design is to modify that evidence to deny truth, evidence, fact, or law into the COURT. Motion in the COURT is only allowed in ADJECTIVE LAW, or (Law without Noun) (Which means Law without People, Place, or Thing). ADJECTIVE LAW is known in the COURT as PROCEDURE. If you look up Procedure in Blacks Law, 4th Edition, you will see what I mean. ((Added by me below will be in brackets))

PROCEDURAL LAW. That which prescribes method of enforcing rights or obtaining redress for their invasion; ((Only the FICTION has to have Rights Enforced, our Rights are Natural)) machinery for carrying on a suit. Barker v. St. Louis County, 340 Mo. 986, 104 S.W.2d 371, 377, 378, 379. As relating to crimes, that which provides or regulates the steps by which one who violates a criminal statute is punished. ((Is it Possible for the Living to violate a CRIMINAL STATUTE?)) State v. Elmore, 179 La. 1057, 155 So. 896. PROCEDURE. .The mode of proceeding by which a legal right is enforced, as distinguished from 1367

PROCEDURE
the law which gives or defines the right ((didn't the Constitution do that)), and which, by means of the proceeding, the court Is to administer ((oh, ADMINISTERIAL COURT)); the machinery ((Machinery not the Living!)), as distinguished from its product. Per Lush, L. J., in 7 Q. B. Div, 333. That which regulates the formal steps in an, action ((Action is the command for the beginning of a Play! Take 2, and ACTION!!!)) ((It is not the Judgement of Law)) or other judicial proceeding; a form, man- ner, and order of conducting suits or prosecutions. ((Conducting SUITS and Pro Se Cutions, not Common Law))Mahoning Valley Ry. Co. v. Santoro, 93 Ohio St. 53, 112 N.E. 190, 191. The judicial process for enforcing rights and duties recognized by substantive ((What the hell is Substantive Law to the living?)) law and for justly administering redress for infraction of them. ((This is all Law for those in the FICTION, it is Administrative in nature, and is in direct violation of the Constitution)) Sims v. United Pacific Ins. Co., D.C.Idaho, 51 F.Supp. 433, 435. This term is commonly opposed to the sum of legal principles constituting the substance of the law ((Re-read that last sentence several times. "is commonly opposed to the sum of legal principles constituting the substance of the law" so, PROCEDURE is Opposed to Substance of Law!!)) , and denotes the body of rules, whether of practice or of pleading ((Practice and Pleading are for ATTORNEYS and SLAVES respectively)) , whereby rights are effectuated ((Why and how are Rights Effectuated)) through the successful application of the proper remedies. It is also generally distinguished from the law of evidence. ((Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding, we have a winner folks! Read that last sentence a dozen or so times! Why would you distinguish something from the law of evidence, unless you were purposely committing a fraud????)) Brown; Sackheim v. Pigueron, 215 N.Y. 62, 109 N.E. 109, 111. Cochran v. Ward, 3 Ind.App. 89, 29 N.E. 795, 31 N.E. 581, 51 Am.St.Rep. 229. Procedure is the machinery for carrying on the suit, including pleading, process, evidence, and practice, whether in the trial court or the appellate court, or in the processes by which causes are carried to appellate courts for review, or in laying the foundation for such review. ((Procedure is not for the Living)) Jones v. Erie R. Co., 106 Ohio St. 408, 140 N.E. 366, 367. It not only embraces practice ((Not Law, but Practice)) in courts, but regulation of the conduct of the court itself wherein such practice takes place. State v. Greenwald, 186 Ind. 321, 116 N.E. 296, 297. The law of procedure is what is now commonly termed by jurists "adjective law," (q. v.). ((Adjective Law has no Noun, no Truth, no Evidence, no Fact, so in Adjective Law, nothing is real, it is all a FICTION, a CARTOON, it is all in MOTION!!))

This calls them laws, but they are not, they are code.

by Ray Cox (Notes) on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 7:53pm

HERE ARE LAWS IN AMERICA MOST DON'T KNOW, BUT SHOULD
The IRS is not a US government agency it is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund)(Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Sen...ate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391)

The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N.(Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. page 816)

The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921(41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654)
The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF (International Monetary Fund)(Presidential Documents Volume 24-No. 4 page 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-2887)
The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over.
(Executive Order 12803)
The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA, and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the U.S. government. Even though the "U.S. Government" held stock in the agencies.(U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239)
Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 forms not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are Department of the Treasury.(20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b))
There are NO Judicial courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes.(FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178)
There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administrators.(FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178)
According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a Social Security number.(House Report (103-826)
New York City is defined in Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that "New York City is the capital of the World." For once, he told the truth.(20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) )
Social Security is not insurance or a contract. Nor is there a Trust Fund.(Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619 Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548)
Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations.(It says U.S. Department of Treasury at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above)
You own NO property, Slaves can't own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours. you are listed as a TENANT.(Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
The Most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme court, but the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.(42 PA. C.S.A. 502)
The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War.(Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it.(Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
America is a British Colony. The 'United States' is a corporation, not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796(Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774)
Britain is owned by the Vatican.(Treaty of 1213)
The Pope can abolish any law in the United States(Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54)
A 1040 Form is for Tribute paid to Britain(IRS Publication 6209)
The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery.(Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493)
The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of Millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493)
The Pope's laws are obligatory on everyone.(Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44)
We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children.(Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)
Military Dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) into Districts(Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary of Estate)
"The People" does NOT include you and me.(Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243)
It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers.(SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348