Friday, November 15, 2013

Tools within Their system that will hold them accountable.

 

This is a powerful case that will get you paid, because the fee for illegal incarceration according to Trezevant v. City of Tampa, 741 F.2d 336 (11th cir.1984), is $65,217 dollars per hour, and $1,800,000 ($1.8 Million) dollars per day.
The plaintiff came to this conclusion, because in Trezevant, a Motorist illegally held for 23 minutes in a traffic charge was awarded $25,000 in damages (Note: multiply the total number of days plaintiff served behind bars with the going fee of $1.8 million dollars per day, in order to determine how much money to award the plaintiff in damages.

case-741-f2d-336-trezevant-v-city-of-tampa.pdf

------------------------------

These Damages were determined by GOVERNMENT itself for the violation listed. Breach Penalty Authority

VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DENIED PROPER WARRANT(S) $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DENIED RIGHT OF REASONABLE DEFENSE ARGUMENTS $250,000.00 18 USC 3571 DEFENSE EVIDENCE (RECORDS) $250,000.00 18 USC 357I
DENIED RIGHT TO TRUTH IN EVIDENCE $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
SLAVERY (Forced Compliance to contracts not held) $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DENIED PROVISIONS IN THE CONSTITUTION $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
TREASON (combined above actions). $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
GENOCIDE $1,000,000.00 18 USC 1091
MISPRISION OF FELONY $500.00 18 USC 4
CONSPIRACY $10,000.00 18 USC 241
EXTORTION $5,000.00 18 USC 872
MAIL THREATS $5,000.00 18 USC 876
FRAUD $10,000.00 18 USC 1001
FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS $10,000.00 18 USC 1001
PERJURY $2,000.00 18 USC 1621
SUBORNATION OF PERJURY $2,000.00 18 USC 1622
GRAND THEFT (18 USC 2112) each $250,000.00
RACKETEERING (Criminal) $25,000.00 18 USC 1963

To determine the xact amount for damages, multiply no. of counts by damage 18 USC 3571, ex.:

RACKETEERING (Civil) Wages Taken $x3 = 5? 18 USC 1964 (Sustained Damages [total] x 3) Thirty-seven (37) Constitutional violations from Count 1: = $9,250,000.00

Damages Dealing with claims of "immunity."

Any claim of " immunity" is a fraud because, if valid, it would prevent removal from office for crimes against the people, which removal is authorized or even mandated under U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section IV; as well as 18 USC 241, 42 USC 1983, 1985, 1986, and other state Constitutions..

No comments:

Post a Comment