Payoffs for Judges, Prosecutors Is Legal by Statute

Payoffs for Judges, Prosecutors Is Legal by Statute
By Pat Shannan

Payoffs for Judges

Anyone who has ever attended an Internal Revenue Service court case
likely noticed the biased attitude of the presiding judge in favor
of the prosecution. Perhaps, though, only those of us who have sat
in courtrooms, in every section of the country, can attest to this
unwavering pattern of unfairness. Whatever happened to the judge's
impartial role of "referee"?

Federal statutes show how and why U.S. law encourages prosecutorial
and judicial conflicts of interest, non-neutrality, non-impartiality
and corruption of justice in the federal courts. (See page 13 for
portions of 5 USC 4502 through 4504 from the United States Code.)

How can the federal judiciary be independent and impartial when
the law permits the federal government to secretly award judges up
to $25,000 in undisclosed secret "cash awards," and to privately,
secretly and "erroneously" overpay them up to $10,000, and "waive"
these erroneous overpayments?

How can any defendant be found innocent or "guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt" when such statutory "cash award" provisions on
their face create an irrefutable, behind-the-scenes incentive for
the prosecution? These questions and others must be answered by the
U.S. District Court in Portland, Oregon following a lawsuit naming
multiple defendants in the Department of Justice including Judge
Anna J. Brown, who presided over a trial of "conspiracy to impede
the IRS" last November.

Defendant Roy Bendshadler's attorney Nancy Bergeson had complained
of suspected "jury tampering" and was found strangled to death in
her Portland home the next day. Her cause of death was at first
passed off as "natural causes" until a second medical examiner
changed it to homicide. The murder is unsolved.

The 94-page action was filed by Michael Sean Mungovan, one of five
convicted in the above 2009 case. Mungovan was sentenced to four
years in prison on July 28. This was an hour after he had served
Judge Brown with a copy of the suit, which should have legally
restricted her from any sentencing action over him until it was
resolved, according to Mungovan.

None of this is new to the IRS. Its manual on pages 1,229 to 1,291
(Delegation Orders of January 17, 1983) outlines the IRS system
of monetary awards "of up to and including $5,000, for any one
individual employee or group of employees, in his/her immediate
office, including field employees, engaged in National Office
projects; and contributions of employees of other government agencies
and armed forces members. "This would include U.S. District Court
judges and U.S. attorneys.

The Mungovan suit, composed by Utah lawyer Dr. Dale Livingston,
explains, "These awards include secret cash awards. They are not
limited as to the number of awards that may be awarded to any one
person or group. There is no limitation placed upon any award. Any
person or group of persons can be awarded this money, including:
U.S. attorneys, federal judges, the president of the United States
or anyone else for that matter."

Livingston added: "The awards may be given to the same person or
group, each minute, each hour, every day, every week, every month,
every year or not at all. In other words, the U.S. government and the
alleged Internal Revenue Service . . . have a perfectly legal (not
lawful) system of bribery. The bribery works against the American
people . . . when they expect impartial justice, and there is no
proof on the record to the contrary."

The murder of attorney Bergeson, who only threatened to initiate an
investigation into what she believed to have been a stacked jury,
sends the warning that Mungovan, by forcing the issue, may have
placed a much larger target on his back.

Lack of space here prevents this writer's attempt to list all the
negative ramifications of such a surreptitious program posing as
"justice for all," but let us consider for a moment a few of the
many dubious convictions from the recent decades reported in AFP
and The Spotlight over the years.

How much money did Judge Paul Benson receive for railroading Yori
Kahl and Scott Faul in 1983? There was no evidence these young
men ever fired a shot in the melee in Medina, North Dakota, where
Yori's father, Gordon, admitted shooting U.S. Marshal Ken Muir in
self-defense. Later it was learned this was the same judge that
had sent away Leonard Peltier of Wounded Knee fame for life, with
no evidence he had killed the two FBI agents found dead after the
1973 shootout. Are judges paid more for high-profile cases?

How about Judge Walter Smith of Waco, Texas? We cannot imagine how
many bucks he may have received after sending away 11 Branch Davidian
Church members, who had been acquitted by a jury of capital crimes in
1994, not long after the Waco massacre of men, women and children by
federal agents and troops. These 11 churchgoers received a total of
240 years. These outrageous maximum sentences for merely carrying a
firearm were applied against people who had not even fired a shot in
self-defense at the onrushing U.S. marshals, U.S. military Special
Forces soldiers and other federal gunmen.

Then there were the Montana Freemen, who were labeled as "separatist
outlaws." In 1996 they were working to expose the banking fraud of
the Federal Reserve System. Many of these men are still in federal
prison, yet they never harmed anyone.

Cash incentives paid for convictions help us understand not only
what has happened in the past, but also what we can expect to see
in the future.

Real Criminals Wearing Suits, Costumes, And Robes

What we have is a group of REAL CRIMINALS, wearing suits (attorneys) , uniforms (cops), and black robes (judges), committing REAL TRUE CRIMES, and doing so against LAW ABIDING PEOPLE, wearing the costume of "THE LAW".

By: Rob Johnson

The last week or so for me has been very difficult, and extremely trying, taxing and vexing to say the least. I am at a point where I no longer believe that it is possible to save this country, and the divinely inspired supreme law which used to dwell in each of us. Today the law is USED to oppress the people that it is supposed to protect. Those who are involved in positions of law enforcement, including attorneys and judges, at every level across the country down to each small town and even villages, are completely insane.

That is what it all comes down to, everyone involved in the existing system, that aspect of it which has transformed law and justice from a tool to protect the people and their freedom, into a tool to protect the revenue stream the state has been shamelessly sucking off of for its survival. TODAY, I went with my friend to the Town of Hamburg, regarding a violation ticket he got. He got scheduled a pretrial conference with the town attorney. What is so ridiculous is the irrational, damned near violent, without question unprofessional, and unnecessarily rude manner the assistant town attorney spoke to my friend with. Within a few seconds of entering this "conference room" and asking only 1 question about being scheduled for a trial, my friend asked, "will this be a jury trial", this assistant town attorney became visibly, obviously, and irrationally irate. And he was every bit as ignorant as he was angry.

This pretrial conference was scheduled before his hearing because of the notice he sent in in response to the violation ticket. At this conference, my friend was supposed to be informed as to the cause and nature of the charges and proceedings against him. He did not even get a chance to ask most of his questions. After he asked about the nature of the trial it was evident that this assistant attorney intended to do nothing but attempt to intimidate him. AND, on top of this, he also refused my friend his right to a jury trial.

I have lost faith completely in what is called the justice system today. There is nothing just about it. The courts used to be about getting to the truth of matters, whatever that truth was. LAW itself used to protect the people and their rights, but not any more.

All of this being said, I am not giving up. If nothing else it shows that mass dissemination of my work is essential more so now than ever before. These people that call themselves professionals, experts, and officers, whether they are police, attorneys, or judges, have got to be reminded who it is that they serve, and WHAT law they are to be upholding and enforcing. These delusional mad men who are pretending, that are unaware they are pretending, no different from a schizophrenic, have got to be put in their place. ALL ISSUES ASIDE, no one has a right to, nor is there ever a cause, for someone like this assistant attorney did, to raise their voice to another. Who in the hell do these mother fuckers think they are? They are not even prosecuting crime, or upholding the law, all they are doing is conducting transactions of security interests, extorting from the masses a stream of revenue, out of fear and ignorance. They are manipulative, deceitful, vindictive, and MUST be stopped, and only WE can do it.

People have to decide what it is they wish for themselves and their children. And people have to make a choice, grow some balls, and refuse to capitulate to fear porn propaganda designed to foster their compliance with things that should never be called law. No matter how far they take it, regardless of any concern, I will never quit, I will never give up this fight. I will never be defeated by these people, hell they are not even coming after me.

And when I was in that conference room with my buddy that assistant attorney DID...ATTEMPT..to intimidate ME as well, asking me my name in a malicious tone with obvious malicious intent. When it came to me though I put his ass in his place and told him "don't you worry about what my name is". I wish this would have been my ticket, as opposed to it being my friend's, because he doesn't listen. He asks me to help with these things, brings me with him to help, and then does the exact opposite of what advise him to do. So now, my friend was scheduled a trial date, but we are going to defeat this whole issue with pretrial motions. In addition I am going to file a grievance with the bar against this assistant town attorney, as well as criminal charges for his crimes. He DID violate my friend's right to a jury trial, even after it was insisted upon.
The most disgusting part of all of this, is that all of these so called professionals, having been taught only what the system wants them to believe to continue propping it up, know nothing more about "THE LAW" than the average individual does. For the most part these criminals just make shit up as they go, and the judges rubber stamp it because the judges, lawyers, and cops, are all on the same side. Every single bit of their intimidation, exists to distract you from what you know is true, and to get you to contract with them, it is all about MONEY, it is ALL about taking YOUR money FROM YOU, and giving it to THEM. What exactly do people think that these revenues from violation tickets are used for?

People have got to wake up and come around to the simple truths of the law. They are really really easy to follow. It is only the agenda of the lie which converts justice into a revenue stream, that obfuscates the truth. It doesnt hide the truth all together, it can still be seen. The truth about the law, the beautiful simplicity, is that if you violate no one's rights, and cause no damage or injury to person or property, you have committed NO OFFENSE OF ANY KIND, certainly nothing that could require you to pay money or time to the State. If you have not done either of those things, you have BROKEN NO LAW.

So in these violation ticket situations you do not have criminals being punished by law, nor do you have the State providing a service that does anything at all of any kind to make things safer. What we have is a group of REAL CRIMINALS, wearing suits (attorneys) , uniforms (cops), and black robes (judges), committing REAL TRUE CRIMES, and doing so against LAW ABIDING PEOPLE, wearing the costume of "THE LAW". They deliberately set fines so they arent worth it to most people to fight them. They do this intentionally so it is not worth it for people to take off of work to stand up for their rights. These criminals all across the country can only be stopped by us, in MASS NON COMPLIANCE. And I will ALWAYS be here doing what I do to fight back no matter how discouraged I may get at times. I will never ever stop fighting this fight until the battle is won and the people come out on top with their freedom in tact."