Who’s the boss?
SEDITION - conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.
Who is the SOVEREIGN?
It will be admitted on all hands that with the exception of the powers
granted to the states and the federal government, through the
Constitutions, the people of the several states are unconditionally
sovereign within their respective states.
[ Ohio L. Ins. & T. Co. v. Debolt 16 How. 416, 14 L.Ed. 997 ]
In America, however, the case is widely different. Our government
is founded upon compact. Sovereignty was, and is, in the people.
[ Glass vs The Sloop Betsey, 3 Dall 6 (1794)]
Technically
speaking, only subject citizens can be guilty of sedition. A sovereign
can’t be charged with inciting rebellion against his own sovereignty or
that of his servant.
Another good reason why WITHDRAWAL of CONSENT is superior to rebellion against voluntary servitude.
Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the
author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are
delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains
with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.
[Yick Wo vs Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)]
...
If the American people are the sovereigns, then anyone who incites
people to rebel against their sovereignty, and submit to the
collectivist state, is the real culprit ... and that includes all
partisan political parties.
Who’s the boss?
SEDITION - conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.
Who is the SOVEREIGN?
It will be admitted on all hands that with the exception of the powers granted to the states and the federal government, through the Constitutions, the people of the several states are unconditionally sovereign within their respective states.
[ Ohio L. Ins. & T. Co. v. Debolt 16 How. 416, 14 L.Ed. 997 ]
In America, however, the case is widely different. Our government is founded upon compact. Sovereignty was, and is, in the people.
[ Glass vs The Sloop Betsey, 3 Dall 6 (1794)]
Technically speaking, only subject citizens can be guilty of sedition. A sovereign can’t be charged with inciting rebellion against his own sovereignty or that of his servant.
Another good reason why WITHDRAWAL of CONSENT is superior to rebellion against voluntary servitude. Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.
[Yick Wo vs Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)]
...
If the American people are the sovereigns, then anyone who incites people to rebel against their sovereignty, and submit to the collectivist state, is the real culprit ... and that includes all partisan political parties.
No comments:
Post a Comment