Only slaves ask for permission to exercise rights.

Actually, the title to this post is wrongheaded. Slaves don't have rights. They only are granted privileges by their masters. They MUST beg for permission to exercise those privileges.

Think about that the next time your about to beg them for permission to do something.
Ask yourself:

1. Is what I want to do lawful to do?
a) If yes, then why do you need to be licensed to do it?
b) If No, then how would asking government somehow make it a lawful activity?

2. Is it my right to do this?

3. Do I have the right to do this?

4. Does it harm another or their rights if I do this?

5. Is there ANY fraud involved? (Gov can not license fraudulent activities, even though they do it all the time)

6. Does my asking for permission to do lawful acts grant them my consent to step in and tell me what to do?

7. Do they then have MY permission to tell me just how I can exercise a right because I consented by asking for their permission?

8. Who died and made them god?

9. Are they MY public servants or MY masters?
a) If public servants, then why are you asking them for permission to exercise your rights?
b) If "masters" then learn why granting them your consent makes that so! And learn what granting them your consent even means!
c) Do I even have rights after I granted them to someone else?

Some stuff to think about before you go begging some pointy headed bureaucrat public servant for permission to exercise your rights such as a constitutionally protected right to bear arms. 

I disagree with some of the information presented in this video, but for the most part, I do agree with the content.
 

Residency

 By: Jamie Weare Notsheep Barker

12505. (a) (1) For purposes of this division only and notwithstanding Section 516, residency shall be determined as a person’s state of domicile. "State of domicile" means the state where a person has his or her true, fixed, and permanent home and principal residence and to which he or she has manifested the intention of returning whenever he or she is absent.

Prima facie evidence of residency for driver’s licensing purposes includes, but is not limited to, the following:

(A) Address where registered to vote.

(B) Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education.

(C) Filing a homeowner’s property tax exemption.

(D) Other acts, occurrences, or events that indicate presence in the state is more than temporary or transient.

(2) California residency is required of a person in order to be issued a commercial driver’s license under this code.

(b) The presumption of residency in this state may be rebutted by satisfactory evidence that the licensee’s primary residence is in another state.

(c) Any person entitled to an exemption under Section 12502, 12503, or 12504 may operate a motor vehicle in this state for not to exceed 10 days from the date he or she establishes residence in this state, except that he or she shall obtain a license from the department upon becoming a resident before being employed for compensation by another for the purpose of driving a motor vehicle on the highways.

(d) If the State of California is decertified by the federal government and prohibited from issuing an initial, renewal, or upgraded commercial driver’s license pursuant to Section 384.405 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the following applies:

(1) An existing commercial driver’s license issued pursuant to this code prior to the date that the state is notified of its decertification shall remain valid until its expiration date.

(2) A person who is a resident of this state may obtain a nonresident commercial driver’s license from any state that elects to issue a nonresident commercial driver’s license and that complies with the testing and licensing standards contained in subparts F, G, and H of Part 383 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

(3) For the purposes of this subdivision, a nonresident commercial driver’s license is a commercial driver’s license issued by a state to an individual domiciled in a foreign country or in another state.

(e) Subject to Section 12504, a person over the age of 16 years who is a resident of a foreign jurisdiction other than a state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or Canada, having a valid driver’s license issued to him or her by any other foreign jurisdiction having licensing standards deemed by the Department of Motor Vehicles equivalent to those of this state, may operate a motor vehicle in this state without obtaining a license from the department, except that he or she shall obtain a license before being employed for compensation by another for the purpose of driving a motor vehicle on the highways.

(f) Any person from a foreign country, except a territory or possession of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or Canada, shall obtain a class A or a class B license from the department before operating on the highways a motor vehicle for which a class A or class B license is required, as described in Section 12804.9. The medical examination form required for issuance of a class A or class B driver’s license shall be completed by a health care professional, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 12804.9, who is licensed, certified, or registered to perform physical examinations in the United States of America. This subdivision does not apply to (1) drivers of schoolbuses operated in California on a trip for educational purposes or (2) drivers of vehicles used to provide the services of a local public agency.

(g) This section does not authorize the employment of a person in violation of Section 12515.

(h) This section shall become operative on September 20, 2005

Amended Sec. 10, Ch. 766, Stats. 1995. Effective January 1, 1996.
Amended Sec. 3, Ch. 952, Stats. 2004. Effective January 1, 2005. Operative September 20, 2005.

Modern Slaves

One of my least favorite things is looking at track housing from an areal photograph. I can't look at all those tight little projects anymore without it screaming out to me slave housing. Add a community board who enforces rules and such, and I just can't comprehend how people are willing to live in one of these places. Especially when you consider that none of these people even own the land their overpriced houses sit on. I just shake my head anymore.

Just another round of tightening the noose of servitude

Just another round of tightening the noose of servitude while further demonizing those who are victims while the real welfare recipients are getting drunk with stealing the product of everyone's labor.

If someone is posting this meme, then it shows a complete lack of understanding of the events going on in the world around them. Ignorance is in fashion these days!

By: NeoRocker Humanitarian Drummer

"If you support such infringements as this on individual choices and sanctity of personal responsibility by imposing that all fit into one MOLD and the STATE must dictate it, you suffer from Stockholm Syndrome (Embracing the oppression of your captor). QUIT demanding that the STATE be your nanny by FORCING OTHERS to abide by your subjective opinions on how others should live their lives. The "Welfare" of others is minding your own fucking business! Individuals that *CHOSE* to live such toxic lives suffer at their own hands and are very easily identified without the invasion of placing everyone in the same boat by giving AUTHORITY to an entity through LEGALITY to stroke your egotistical subjective control issues."

"Do you have my permission to ask me that question slave?"

Where has that gotten us?

I just watched The Grapes of Wrath again a few weeks ago. First time since waking up to what's been going on. I always thought that camp they found refuge in was a good thing. The one set up by the Department of Agriculture. This time it occurred to me what it was really about. Getting the people conditioned to being dependent on the nanny state to come to their rescue. 

Where has that gotten us?

Welfare STATE with millions of dependents who's mother and father are the STATE itself. Millions of dependents who are bound by adhesion contract and their own consent to do as they are told by their corporate parents.